Editorial standards

Five rules we hold ourselves to when we publish anything on this site.

1. We rank based on fit, not commission

Our rankings reflect what we'd pick if we were doing the work ourselves. The commission a vendor pays is documented for transparency but is not an input into the ranking. We've ranked tools with no affiliate program ahead of tools that pay us 50% recurring when the no-program tool is the better fit.

2. Pricing is current and verified

Every tool's price is checked against the vendor's official pricing page during research and re-checked monthly. Last-updated dates appear on every page. If you spot a price that's wrong, email us at chris@toolsbyrole.com and we'll fix it within 24 hours.

3. Cons are real, not balanced for show

Many "pros and cons" lists fabricate weak cons to look balanced. We try to write cons that are actually disqualifying for the wrong buyer. If a tool's only real con is "the UI takes a week to learn," we say that. If a tool has no real reason not to use it for a specific use case, we say that too.

4. We don't take payment for placement

Vendors cannot pay to be added to a comparison, ranked higher, or featured. Several have asked; we have declined all of them. Joining one of our pages requires meeting the criteria above.

5. We correct publicly

When we make a mistake, the correction is visible in the page's update history (via the "Last updated" date), and a short correction note is added inline if the change materially affects the ranking. We don't quietly rewrite history.

How AI assists our process

We use AI tools (the same ones we recommend) for first-draft research, summarization, and copy-editing. Every published page is then reviewed and edited by a human before going live. AI accelerates the work; it doesn't replace the judgment.

← Back to home